<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>We the Media</title>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2006</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:26:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:17:11 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Book Published in Taiwan</title>
<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.oreilly.com.tw/product_others.php?id=a157">Taiwanese edition</a> has been published, and today's China Times has <a href="http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/Philology/Philology-Book/0,3427,112005040400404+1105130301+20050404+news,00.html">a review</a>. Hope it's friendly...]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/04/book_published.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/04/book_published.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:26:51 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Serious Ad Money for Blog</title>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><li>Ad Age (reg req): <a href="http://adage.com/news.cms?newsId=42453">Sony Pays $25,000 a Month for Gawker Blog</a>. <i>Sony Consumer Electronics e-Solutions Group is the exclusive sponsor for the launch of LifeHacker, a blog that goes live today about the software of personal gadgetry by Gawker Media, according to the online company. The deal, which also includes placements on Gizmodo, Gawker's earlier gadget title, will cost Sony in the range of $25,000 a month, according to a source close to the deal. The sponsorship runs for about three months.</i> </blockquote> Well, there go the pay scales at Nick Denton's company...

I'm not nuts about the sole-sponsor ad model, but it's obviously going to be a wave of the future in personal journalism.

<em>(Via <a href="http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/">Alan Mutter</a>)</em>]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/02/serious_ad_mone.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/02/serious_ad_mone.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 04:30:27 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Finding Common Ground in Translation</title>
<description><![CDATA[I'm reminded of that by a call this morning from António Granado, who writes about science for <a href="http://www.publico.pt/">Publico</a>, a major daily newspaper, and posts frequently to his <a href="http://ciberjornalismo.com/pontomedia.htm">own journalism blog</a>. He's reviewing <a href="http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/"><em>We the Media</em></a>, which has just been published in Portuguese.

We Americans tend to take for granted the ascendency of English. While English has become the international language of commerce, science and aviation -- and it's becoming a common second language around the globe -- cultures are holding onto what makes them unique. As they should.

One of the reasons I like to travel is meeting people who aren't like me in their own lands. We all refract life through human lenses, but our cultures determine a lot about who we are beyond that.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/01/finding_common.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/01/finding_common.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>USA Today Book Mention</title>
<description><![CDATA[Phil Meyer, journalism professor at the University of North Carolina, says the major media are being more <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-01-12-meyer_x.htm">"closely watched"</a> -- in large part by bloggers -- and humbled in the process.<p>]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/01/usa_today_book.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/01/usa_today_book.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dan&apos;s New Life</title>
<description><![CDATA[I've left the San Jose Mercury News to work on a grassroots journalism project. You can find out much more about it on my <a href="http://dangillmor.typepad.com/dan_gillmor_on_grassroots/">new blog</a>.<p>]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/01/dans_new_life.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2005/01/dans_new_life.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2005 02:06:08 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Journalism Giant Retires</title>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/images/moyers.jpg" height="73" width="68" border="0" align="left" hspace="0" vspace="0" alt="Bill Moyers" title="Bill Moyers" />Bill Moyers <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/17/arts/television/17moye.html?ex=1261026000&en=e634685e55090435&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland">has completed</a>his last episode of <a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/">NOW with Bill Moyers</a>, a PBS program that looked in depth at critical issues. 

Moyers is a hero in journalism. He's not always right, but he's been asking the tough questions.

He's been especially tough on the press, which in many ways has abdicated its public trust in recent years. We need more voices like his, not fewer.<p>]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/a_journalism_gi.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/a_journalism_gi.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citizen Journalism: A Newspaper Goes for It</title>
<description><![CDATA[As Jay Rosen explains in his latest <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2004/12/18/grns_nr.html">PressThink article</a>, the local paper in Greensboro, N.C., is turning its online self into a community square. Bravo. This is a big deal.

And as Ed Cone <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0107946/2004/12/18.html">observes</a> -- Ed is a blogger of note and columnist for the paper -- this isn't exactly rocket science. Anyone can do it. Almost every newspaper should try.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/citizen_journal_1.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/citizen_journal_1.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:38:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comments problems</title>
<description>Several folks have told me they can&apos;t post comments lately. We&apos;re looking into the situation. Sorry about that.</description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/comments_proble.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/comments_proble.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:26:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Citizen Journalism Project</title>
<description><![CDATA[As noted <a href="http://weblog.siliconvalley.com/column/dangillmor/archives/011101.shtml#011101">here</a>on my SiliconValley.com blog, I'm leaving the Mercury News to work on a grassroots journalism project. Scary and thrilling at the same time.

At a Harvard University conference where I spoke last week, the folks from Korea's amazing <a href="http://www.ohmynews.com">OhmyNews</a>, one of my inspirations in this project (and covered at some length in the book), <a href="http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=201088&rel_no=1">interviewed me</a> about the project. You'll note there aren't many details yet, but I hope to say much more soon.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/a_citizen_journ.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/a_citizen_journ.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:26:33 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Book Notes</title>
<description><![CDATA[Several items of note:

<li>Patrick Frey, whose right-of-center <a href="http://patterico.com">Patterico's Pontifications</a> blog has been a useful thorn in the side of the <a href="http://www.latimes.com">Los Angeles Times</a>, has posted a kind and thoughtful <a href="http://patterico.com/archives/003126.php">review</a> of <em>We the Media</em>. (He disagrees, in a <a href="http://patterico.com/archives/003126.php">separate posting</a>, with one particular line in the book.)

<li>The <a href="http://news.ft.com/home/us">Financial Times</a> ran a long article this week about my book and a related book by a British journalist. I can't point to the piece, by Alan Cane, because it's behind a subscription wall. But it's a deep look at some the big issues facing journalism.

Interestingly, Frey's piece comes on the day when we learned that the LA Times is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30277-2004Dec2.html">closing its national print edition</a>, citing the Internet as a good enough way to reach readers outside the LA metro area.

I also got an email this morning from Phil Shapiro, noting a (relatively) <a href="http://teachme.blogspot.com/2004_11_28_teachme_archive.html#110209217577193915">long-ago conversation</a> he had with a Washington Post reporter. Journalism is changing, he observes.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/book_notes_2.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/book_notes_2.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 05:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Words You Can&apos;t Write on Microsoft Blogs</title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft launched its <a href="http://spaces.msn.com/">MSN Spaces</a> blogware product today, an event noteworthy only in that it stamps our favorite monopolist's approval on the genre. But the rules of the road for these Web writings are distinctly nanny-ish, as BoingBoing's Xeni Jardin <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2004/12/02/msn_spaces_seven_dir.html">hilariously reports</a>.

This will make Microsoft an object of derision in the blogosphere. Better to do it right, and let people say what they want to say.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/words_you_cant.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/words_you_cant.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 09:23:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Newspaper Goes for Reader-Written Blogs</title>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><li>Loic Le Meur: <a href="http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2004/12/le_monde_puts_r.html">Le Monde puts reader-bloggers at the same level as journalists</a>. <em> Le Monde is one of the first newspapers in the World to offer blogs to their readers, under the Le Monde brand. They have also published a ranking of the 10 top blogs, mixing their journalists blogs and their readers blogs, showing them at the same level, based on blog readers recommendations.</em></li></blockquote><p>
Fascinating move. I hope it succeeds.
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/newspaper_goes.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/12/newspaper_goes.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:43:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>China&apos;s Latest Web Blockade</title>
<description><![CDATA[Reporters Without Borders <a href="http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=11968">reports</a> that China is blocking <a href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a>. This surprises me, given that Google has already self-censored its content to appease Beijing.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/11/chinas_latest_w.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/11/chinas_latest_w.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:23:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Guardian&apos;s Waldman Joins Blogosphere</title>
<description><![CDATA[Simon Waldman, who runs <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">Guardian Online</a>, has started a <a href="http://www.simonwaldman.net/">new blog</a> that's well worth your time if you care about the future of journalism. (Disclosure: He wrote a flattering review of my book. I'd point to his blog even if he'd panned it...)]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/11/guardians_waldm.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/11/guardians_waldm.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:21:22 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Web Citations Now Fully Linked</title>
<description><![CDATA[Many thanks to <a href="http://mcallister.ws/">Kevin McAllister</a>, who posted <a href="http://mcallister.ws/wtm-directory.html">this page</a> of links to the websites I mentioned in the book.
]]></description>
<link>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/11/web_citations_n.html</link>
<guid>http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/archives/2004/11/web_citations_n.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:34:47 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>